Assigning instead of Comparing

The code uses an operator for assignment when the intention was to perform a comparison.


Description

In many languages the compare statement is very close in appearance to the assignment statement and are often confused. This bug is generally the result of a typo and usually causes obvious problems with program execution. If the comparison is in an if statement, the if statement will usually evaluate the value of the right-hand side of the predicate.

Demonstrations

The following examples help to illustrate the nature of this weakness and describe methods or techniques which can be used to mitigate the risk.

Note that the examples here are by no means exhaustive and any given weakness may have many subtle varieties, each of which may require different detection methods or runtime controls.

Example One

The following C/C++ and C# examples attempt to validate an int input parameter against the integer value 100.

int isValid(int value) {
  if (value=100) {
    printf("Value is valid\n");
    return(1);
  }
  printf("Value is not valid\n");
  return(0);
}
bool isValid(int value) {
  if (value=100) {
    Console.WriteLine("Value is valid.");
    return true;
  }
  Console.WriteLine("Value is not valid.");
  return false;
}

However, the expression to be evaluated in the if statement uses the assignment operator "=" rather than the comparison operator "==". The result of using the assignment operator instead of the comparison operator causes the int variable to be reassigned locally and the expression in the if statement will always evaluate to the value on the right hand side of the expression. This will result in the input value not being properly validated, which can cause unexpected results.

Example Two

In this example, we show how assigning instead of comparing can impact code when values are being passed by reference instead of by value. Consider a scenario in which a string is being processed from user input. Assume the string has already been formatted such that different user inputs are concatenated with the colon character. When the processString function is called, the test for the colon character will result in an insertion of the colon character instead, adding new input separators. Since the string was passed by reference, the data sentinels will be inserted in the original string (CWE-464), and further processing of the inputs will be altered, possibly malformed..

void processString (char *str) {

  int i;

  for(i=0; i<strlen(str); i++) {
    if (isalnum(str[i])){
      processChar(str[i]);
    }
    else if (str[i] = ':') {
      movingToNewInput();}
    }
  }

}

Example Three

The following Java example attempts to perform some processing based on the boolean value of the input parameter. However, the expression to be evaluated in the if statement uses the assignment operator "=" rather than the comparison operator "==". As with the previous examples, the variable will be reassigned locally and the expression in the if statement will evaluate to true and unintended processing may occur.

public void checkValid(boolean isValid) {
  if (isValid = true) {
    System.out.println("Performing processing");
    doSomethingImportant();
  }
  else {
    System.out.println("Not Valid, do not perform processing");
    return;
  }
}

While most Java compilers will catch the use of an assignment operator when a comparison operator is required, for boolean variables in Java the use of the assignment operator within an expression is allowed. If possible, try to avoid using comparison operators on boolean variables in java. Instead, let the values of the variables stand for themselves, as in the following code.

public void checkValid(boolean isValid) {
  if (isValid) {
    System.out.println("Performing processing");
    doSomethingImportant();
  }
  else {
    System.out.println("Not Valid, do not perform processing");
    return;
  }
}

Alternatively, to test for false, just use the boolean NOT operator.

public void checkValid(boolean isValid) {
  if (!isValid) {
    System.out.println("Not Valid, do not perform processing");
    return;
  }
  System.out.println("Performing processing");
  doSomethingImportant();
}

Example Four

The following example demonstrates the weakness.

void called(int foo){
  if (foo=1) printf("foo\n");
}
int main() {


  called(2);
  return 0;

}

See Also

Comprehensive Categorization: Insufficient Control Flow Management

Weaknesses in this category are related to insufficient control flow management.

SEI CERT C Coding Standard - Guidelines 03. Expressions (EXP)

Weaknesses in this category are related to the rules and recommendations in the Expressions (EXP) section of the SEI CERT C Coding Standard.

SFP Secondary Cluster: Glitch in Computation

This category identifies Software Fault Patterns (SFPs) within the Glitch in Computation cluster (SFP1).

Comprehensive CWE Dictionary

This view (slice) covers all the elements in CWE.

Weaknesses Introduced During Implementation

This view (slice) lists weaknesses that can be introduced during implementation.

Weaknesses in Software Written in Java

This view (slice) covers issues that are found in Java programs that are not common to all languages.


Common Weakness Enumeration content on this website is copyright of The MITRE Corporation unless otherwise specified. Use of the Common Weakness Enumeration and the associated references on this website are subject to the Terms of Use as specified by The MITRE Corporation.